A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Specific Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their see, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal setting up disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out depending on Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are Paul Feely actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.